Maddow Madhatters cowering under their green cotton sustainable forest beds after being propagandized into believing that Tea Party ready to commit acts of domestic terrorism like Tim McVeigh. She didn't have any proof to support those assertions but the sheeeeeeple belieeeeeeeved she did. Guess she forgot this:
Showing posts with label Maddow. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Maddow. Show all posts
20 April 2010
21 February 2010
9 Minutes of My Life I'll Never Get Back...
Rachel Maddow spends nearly nine minutes here proving NOTHING, but I have liberal friends who will tell me "But she had video clips so I believe her." I hate to trot out the tired old theme of OUT OF CONTEXT, but she has taken these clips COMPLETELY out of context. It won't seem that way, because she will say that his seemingly contradictory statements come from the same show, as proof of something... I'll get to that.
She asserts that Beck lies when he says he never said that one big snowstorm disproves global warming then plays clips of him making fun of the snowstorm when the earth is supposedly warming... What she DOESN'T play are clips of him saying, and there are MANY, that "weather" isn't "climate" AND COUNTLESS clips of members of the cult of global warming asserting that weather IS climate, like Robert Kennedy, just last year, saying that "DC WILL NEVER SEE SNOW AGAIN" (or words to that effect.)
She asserts that Beck has pointed to weather many times as proof that global warming doesn't exist. That's right. He points out cold weather. He points out warm weather. She can play those clips all day long and it will SEEM, to the woefully uninformed, that she is RIGHT and that Beck, is indeed lying.
WRONG.
Charles Krauthammer got it right, and is the underpinning of Beck's comments that Maddow says are contradictory. If she played his entire 13 minute rant (or however long it was, I happened to hear it live) you would have heard it. Krauthammer, who holds a medical degree, said, in essence, that in science, if something proves everything, then it proves nothing. The global warming (now climate change - there's your sign right there) freaks are the ones running around calling EVERY WEATHER EVENT a sign of global warming. LOOK IT UP. I'm not going to do it, it's a waste of my time. Just writing this blog piece is damned near a waste of my time because this whole thing is so RIDICULOUS. I just can't take these limousine liberals sniffing that Maddow is so smart and reasoned because she has "clips." Uh-huh.
THERE IS NO SETTLED SCIENCE ON THIS. NONE. And the science that was supposedly settled is now so hopelessly corrupted that it's a JOKE.
Watch this is you must. It's almost unbearable because her pomposity is rooted in an assertion that is fundamentally flawed, so it's kinda painful to see her flailing about, but I leave it here so that you can watch and make your own conclusions if you must...but let me repeat: It's the climate change cult that points to every weather event as proof of their corrupted science and THAT is what Beck is making fun of here! AAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
She asserts that Beck lies when he says he never said that one big snowstorm disproves global warming then plays clips of him making fun of the snowstorm when the earth is supposedly warming... What she DOESN'T play are clips of him saying, and there are MANY, that "weather" isn't "climate" AND COUNTLESS clips of members of the cult of global warming asserting that weather IS climate, like Robert Kennedy, just last year, saying that "DC WILL NEVER SEE SNOW AGAIN" (or words to that effect.)
She asserts that Beck has pointed to weather many times as proof that global warming doesn't exist. That's right. He points out cold weather. He points out warm weather. She can play those clips all day long and it will SEEM, to the woefully uninformed, that she is RIGHT and that Beck, is indeed lying.
WRONG.
Charles Krauthammer got it right, and is the underpinning of Beck's comments that Maddow says are contradictory. If she played his entire 13 minute rant (or however long it was, I happened to hear it live) you would have heard it. Krauthammer, who holds a medical degree, said, in essence, that in science, if something proves everything, then it proves nothing. The global warming (now climate change - there's your sign right there) freaks are the ones running around calling EVERY WEATHER EVENT a sign of global warming. LOOK IT UP. I'm not going to do it, it's a waste of my time. Just writing this blog piece is damned near a waste of my time because this whole thing is so RIDICULOUS. I just can't take these limousine liberals sniffing that Maddow is so smart and reasoned because she has "clips." Uh-huh.
THERE IS NO SETTLED SCIENCE ON THIS. NONE. And the science that was supposedly settled is now so hopelessly corrupted that it's a JOKE.
Watch this is you must. It's almost unbearable because her pomposity is rooted in an assertion that is fundamentally flawed, so it's kinda painful to see her flailing about, but I leave it here so that you can watch and make your own conclusions if you must...but let me repeat: It's the climate change cult that points to every weather event as proof of their corrupted science and THAT is what Beck is making fun of here! AAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
11 February 2010
What about Biden Taking Credit FOR IRAQ????????????????????
UPDATE: I posted the (black) text below several hours ago and then it occurred to me: Joe Biden was on Larry King last night saying that Iraq will be a crowning achievement (or words to that effect) of the Obama administration.
WHAT?
They TRASHED the war. TRASHED the surge. OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER again. If Joe had had his way Iraq would have been balkanized. WHAT THE???????
It's BREATHTAKING, their hypocrisy, really. Gee, you think Ms. Rachel will run clip after clip of her boys trashing the war just like the video above? I would BET MY HOUSE she will not.
There are some assertions here I could bicker with, but Maddow makes a compelling case for GOP hypocrisy here. It's TERRIBLE television. I mean REALLY boring. No wonder their ratings s*ck, but she makes her case... But I must respond to her "party of no" assertions this way:
Just because they're hypocrites doesn't make them wrong but they SHOULD be voted OUT OF OFFICE... And if they vote no against something of Obama's I would wager because it increases rather decreases the role of government in our lives and/or increases the debt, so on those grounds, I'm all for it, but holding up checks for money they voted against? She's right. Wildly hypocritical and grounds for voting them out of office.
The reason so many of us are watching Scott Brown and Sarah Palin so closely is that so far they've told the TRUTH and have the COURAGE OF THEIR CONVICTIONS.
All these hacks in Maddow's piece holding up checks representing funds they voted against should be ashamed of themselves. That's not to suggest that I think the stimulus was a good idea... I don't. I think TAX CUTS could have resulted in far more sustainable growth and NOT impoverished our nation even further than it already is. Can you imagine how much money would start moving through the economy if we gave SIGNIFICANT tax breaks to employers and a SIGNIFICANT payroll tax cut? OMG. Know how I know it would work? BECAUSE EVERY TIME IT'S BEEN TRIED IT HAS WORKED. Let me repeat that.
EVERY TIME TAX CUTS HAVE BEEN USED TO STIMULATE ECONOMIC GROWTH IT'S WORKED.
Oh, and one other thing: I wonder if Maddow will take Obama to task for his "read my lips" moment when he said he's "agnostic" on the subject of taxing incomes less than 250k...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
