Chairman of National Black Panther Party's Version of DOJ's Case

The Chairman of the National Black Panther Party explains what happened, as only he can, with the voter intimidation charges we've heard so much about of late (not on ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, NPR, New York Times etc... but from media with stones, Fox, talk radio, and Drudge.)  Oh, and even though Canada denied him entry because they regarded him a merchant of hate in May of 2009, he was welcomed into the White House on July 25, 2009, visitor records show.

This is a partial transcript of the video below:

"... We decided that on election day that we would go out to the polls because of what?  Because they said they was goin' be stoppin' black people from comin' to vote.  We knew that they didn't want a black man in office ... We wanted to make sure that the police wasn't harrassin' our people ...It's just that the New Black Panther Party sometimes... we tend to do it kinda strong... and sometimes it can even be too black and too strong ... King Samir Shabaaz ... just was a little bit too strong and he was caught out there at the polling place with a nightstick ... and the John McCain campaign ...jumped all over the issue and all over the brother ...The United States Justice Department still under George Bush ...immediately charged (us) ...The Justice Department leadership changed into the hands of a black man ...Eric Holder ...and they threw most of everything out ...They said King Samir can't go back to the polling place until two thousand twelve and I'm sure King Samir don't give a damn (laughter) whether he go back (laughter) he say he don't believe in the white man's votin' system anyway so he don't give a damn... and for the record... King Samir is welcome back in the New Black Panther Party..."


Here's a link to the video at The Daily Caller:


http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/10/not-only-are-the-new-black-panthers-above-the-law-apparently-they-are-the-law/

Another First Amendment Skeever in the White House

"...Radio jamming, which was proposed to try to suppress these hateful broadcasts ...something as seemingly innocuous as radio jamming ...Knowing that even talking about radio jamming, there's a clog-up; that you're not going to get very far ...There was no noise clamoring for anything other than radio jamming from the rest of us ...It's not enough simply to be passively in favor of a value-driven U.S. foreign policy ...Tony Lake ...National Security Adviser of the United States ...said, 'Look, I hear you, I hear about radio jamming...' ...So radio jamming gets debated, and the response is, 'Well, you know, if we actually jam hate radio, it violates freedom of speech...'"

Samantha Power in a 2003 PBS interview about African genocide.  Yet another liberal whose first instinct is to CRUSH free speech as though the exchange of ideas is TOXIC rather than the essential DNA of liberty.


Who's Samantha Power?  She's the one who called Hillary Clinton a "monster" during the campaign, which got her canned, then immediately hired once Obama won, on the National Security Council.


Bonus? She's married to Cass Sunstein. Who's he? The last stop before law touches you. He's the regulatory czar. He crosses the t's and dots the i's on law before it leave the door and actually starts functioning in real life.  He takes the laws and says "Okay. The law says we have to do this... How?"  He's the nuts and bolts guy. So if the legislation is full of squishy language like "may" or "fair" or "reasonable" HE DECIDES what that means.  Sunstein's the guy that thinks all sites on the internet should be FORCED to link to opposing opinion.  Know what that means?  If you don't do it, the federal government would have the power to act on that... Do you *really* want the federal government to have that much power over you? REALLY?


God help us all. 


Link to the entire interview is here: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/ghosts/interviews/power.html